Chicken
07-14-04, 09:41 PM
I wanted to get your thoughts on whether this was acceptable (as is) or whether any for of it is acceptable (change the terms such as no free month offered, etc.) - please read below and the comments under and tell me what you think.
In the past, providers have asked for reviews. This is just the latest one, but I'm not trying to pick on anyone in particular, it's just being used as an example, because it's current...
Hello <anyhost> customers,
This offer is only open to customers who have been with <anyhost> for 4 months or more.
If you post an <anyhost> review at <thisforum> or www.hosthideout.com or <thatforum> in either the main forum or reseller hosting forum(for <anyhost> resellers) and it is a no-joke honest review, you will get a free month of hosting.
This offer remains open until further notice.
Now, the request and offer was not for positive reviews (rather to quote, "no-joke honest review") however what you might not know when you read the reviews is that reviewers were offered something in return for posting a review.
No where does it say that someone who posts a negative review would be denied a month free of hosting. Then again, a month free of something that isn't working doesn't make much sense.
In some ways, getting your clients to post reviews on forums might be a benefit to members as often there is a lack of objective, positive reviews on forums. Plenty of "my host wronged me" but few positive ones (which means it's helpful in knowing who not to pick but sometimes hard to figure out who one should pick).
It could be construed that this is planted psuedo-advertising (and I admit I haven't come to a conclusion about that myself), and if every provider did this, the forums would be filled with "requested reviews" in which, by posting the review, the reviewer got something in return from the provider. There's something a bit disturbing about that, but again, the request made by the provider was a "no-joke honest review" (a request for a positive review would certainly be disturbing).
So what do you think of this? Would it be OK as is? Would it be OK if there was no added offer (a month free of hosting, or other offer)? Sometimes these requests are sent via emails directly to clients and one person "blows the whistle" so to speak on the request, mostly to exaplin *why* there are so many reviews for a particular provider during a short period. The above request wasn't sneaky, it was posted on their support forums, plain view, anyone could read it. They weren't trying to hide and I've seen this done a few other times as well.
Thoughts?
In the past, providers have asked for reviews. This is just the latest one, but I'm not trying to pick on anyone in particular, it's just being used as an example, because it's current...
Hello <anyhost> customers,
This offer is only open to customers who have been with <anyhost> for 4 months or more.
If you post an <anyhost> review at <thisforum> or www.hosthideout.com or <thatforum> in either the main forum or reseller hosting forum(for <anyhost> resellers) and it is a no-joke honest review, you will get a free month of hosting.
This offer remains open until further notice.
Now, the request and offer was not for positive reviews (rather to quote, "no-joke honest review") however what you might not know when you read the reviews is that reviewers were offered something in return for posting a review.
No where does it say that someone who posts a negative review would be denied a month free of hosting. Then again, a month free of something that isn't working doesn't make much sense.
In some ways, getting your clients to post reviews on forums might be a benefit to members as often there is a lack of objective, positive reviews on forums. Plenty of "my host wronged me" but few positive ones (which means it's helpful in knowing who not to pick but sometimes hard to figure out who one should pick).
It could be construed that this is planted psuedo-advertising (and I admit I haven't come to a conclusion about that myself), and if every provider did this, the forums would be filled with "requested reviews" in which, by posting the review, the reviewer got something in return from the provider. There's something a bit disturbing about that, but again, the request made by the provider was a "no-joke honest review" (a request for a positive review would certainly be disturbing).
So what do you think of this? Would it be OK as is? Would it be OK if there was no added offer (a month free of hosting, or other offer)? Sometimes these requests are sent via emails directly to clients and one person "blows the whistle" so to speak on the request, mostly to exaplin *why* there are so many reviews for a particular provider during a short period. The above request wasn't sneaky, it was posted on their support forums, plain view, anyone could read it. They weren't trying to hide and I've seen this done a few other times as well.
Thoughts?